Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Europ Assistance Australia Now Underwriting Its Own Travel Insurance Policies

07 May 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant development for the Australian travel insurance sector, Europ Assistance Australia (EAA) has been granted a general insurance licence by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). This authorisation enables EAA to underwrite its own travel insurance products, marking a pivotal step in its commitment to the Australian market. - read more

ATIA Pushes for Permanent Travel Insurance Sales Rights for Agents

07 May 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Travel Industry Association (ATIA) is intensifying its efforts to secure a permanent authorisation for travel agents, tour operators, and accredited travel businesses to sell travel insurance at the time of booking. This initiative follows an exemption granted in 2021, which is set to expire in October 2026. - read more

Nib Divests World Nomads International Travel Insurance to Focus on Core Health Services

07 May 2026: Paige Estritori

In a strategic move to concentrate on its core health insurance operations, Nib Holdings has entered into a binding agreement to sell its World Nomads international travel insurance business to International Medical Group (IMG) for a cash consideration of $67.5 million. This transaction is subject to regulatory approvals and customary conditions, with the majority of proceeds expected within the current calendar year. - read more

Cover-More and Aon Forge New Travel Insurance Partnership in Australia

29 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant development for the Australian travel insurance market, Cover-More, a subsidiary of Zurich's Cover-More Group, has entered into a strategic partnership with global brokerage firm Aon. This collaboration designates Cover-More as the exclusive provider of travel insurance products to Aon's Australian retail customers and employees. - read more

ATIA Intensifies Efforts to Secure Permanent Travel Insurance Sales Rights

29 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Travel Industry Association (ATIA) is actively campaigning to secure the permanent right for travel agents, tour operators, and accredited travel businesses to sell travel insurance at the time of booking. This initiative follows an exemption granted in 2021, which is set to expire in October 2026. - read more

Click for more Insurance News