Landmark NSW Decision: Dog Walking Costs Covered in Car Crash Injury Claims

1

The claimant, Jeffrey Forrest, sustained injuries to his neck, shoulder, arm, and hand following a rear-end car collision in 2020. His recovery was compounded by a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder. Last September, he sought to include the expenses incurred from employing a dog walking service in his claim for statutory benefits from QBE, the compulsory third-party insurer. At that point, Forrest had accrued approximately $800 in dog walking fees.

Initially, QBE covered some of the dog walking expenses, paying $39.95 per session. However, they later rejected further claims, stating that after Forrest’s recovery from surgery in March, such expenses were neither "reasonable nor necessary." QBE contended that dog walking did not constitute treatment or typical care, making it ineligible under the "attendant care services" category.

In a decisive move, commission member Belinda Cassidy ruled that dog walking indeed fits the scope of attendant care services, which aim to assist with everyday tasks. She explained that such services encompass personal assistance, nursing, home maintenance, and domestic tasks. She clarified that "everyday" does not imply daily occurrence, establishing that dog walking is an intrinsic part of Forrest's domestic life for which he may need support.

The insurer, QBE, argued there was no proof that Forrest was responsible for dog walking duties before the accident. Ms Cassidy acknowledged this might influence a separate evaluation of the costs’ reasonableness. However, she highlighted the possibility that Forrest's family, particularly his wife, might lack the time now due to new responsibilities, thereby necessitating such services.

The decision has been sent back to the commission for further medical assessments to conclusively determine if the dog walking expenses are reasonable and necessary, along with a review of associated costs.

Published:Thursday, 3rd Jul 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Asbestos Scare Leaves Hospitality Business Uninsured 04 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The discovery of asbestos-contaminated mulch in a Sydney park led to the cancellation of a festival, resulting in significant financial losses for a hospitality business. Despite these setbacks, the company's claim for coverage under its business interruption (BI) policy was rejected. - read more

Landmark NSW Decision: Dog Walking Costs Covered in Car Crash Injury Claims 03 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori In a groundbreaking decision by the NSW Personal Injury Commission, an insurer has been directed to cover the costs of dog walking services for a car crash victim. The commission ruled that these services classify as domestic assistance under the state’s Motor Accident Injuries Act. This case could pave the way for broader interpretations of 'attendant care services' for claimants. - read more

Extreme Weather Drives $1.8 Billion in First Half Losses for Australian Insurers 03 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori Extreme weather events in Australia have resulted in significant financial impacts for insurers, tallying $1.83 billion in losses during the first half of the year. This comes as insurance companies gear up for further claims linked to ongoing severe weather in New South Wales. - read more

ClearView Names New Underwriting Head Amidst Strategic Changes 30 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori ASX-listed life insurer ClearView has announced the appointment of Peter Tilocca as Head of Underwriting, coinciding with key updates to its underwriting standards and definitions. Tilocca's extensive two-decade career in Australian underwriting includes leadership roles at Zurich, Noble Oak, One Path Life, and RGA Australia. His new role with ClearView commenced on 30 June. - read more

Ombudsman Supports Theft Claimant in Home Business Coverage Dispute 30 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori A recent case has seen a policyholder triumph over her insurer after the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) ruled in her favour following a contentious dispute regarding home business operations. The controversy arose when the woman's theft claim was denied by her insurance provider, IAG, over allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation about the use of her rental property. - read more