AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case

2

The woman was diagnosed with cancer in her right breast on October 5 of last year, followed by the discovery of cancer in her left breast eight days later. She filed claims under her critical illness policy that she had obtained on July 17.

However, TAL Life, her insurance provider, rejected the claims based on the policy's three-month qualifying period for cancer coverage.

In its ruling, AFCA noted that the policy had provisions to potentially waive the qualifying period if the policyholder could prove they were insured either under a previous TAL policy or by another insurer for the same events, right before their new coverage commenced.

The claimant contended that she had cancer coverage through an insurance policy provided by her husband's employer. She presented a letter from the employer affirming that she was covered under a "life, accident, critical illness, and medical insurance" scheme from August 2020 until June last year. Additionally, she showed documentation indicating her husband’s policy did include critical illness coverage for spouses, encompassing cancer.

While AFCA accepted the availability of this cancer coverage, it was not convinced that she held such coverage "immediately before the current policy began." It also noted she had failed to disclose her previous insurance when applying for the new policy with TAL Life.

"There is no information before me about the extent of the critical illness cover the complainant had, if any, through her husband's employer’s insurance arrangements," AFCA’s ombudsman stated.

"Furthermore, it appears that any cover she might have had ceased about a month before the new policy started. I am not convinced there was 'continuity of cover' as suggested by the complainant."

The ombudsman expressed AFCA’s sympathy towards the claimant, especially given that the diagnoses occurred "very close to the end of the qualifying period." Nonetheless, he emphasized that there was no valid reason for the qualifying period to be dismissed.

"The qualifying period is reasonably short and its existence is not unjust. These terms are part of all insurance policies and they draw necessary boundaries. The enforcement of these terms is not inherently unfair," the ombudsman elaborated.

For a more detailed account of the ruling, refer to the original report by AFCA.

Published:Wednesday, 4th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

AFCA Sides with Policyholder in Storm Damage Dispute 18 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori A recent ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has favoured a policyholder in a dispute with insurer Auto & General over storm damage. The case involved a collapsed ceiling, initially attributed to a storm by the insurer before an about-face led them to deny the claim. The AFCA decision marks a significant instance where consumer protection mechanisms have countered an insurer's attempt to deny coverage. - read more

Transforming Home Insurance: The Rise of the Home Energy Revolution 17 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The landscape of home insurance policies in Australia stands on the brink of transformation as an increasing number of homes, apartment complexes, and small businesses are projected to integrate solar panels and battery systems by 2050. According to a report from the actuarial consultancy Finity, these homes will evolve into independent power stations, generating and storing their own electricity, marking a pivotal shift in home energy management. - read more

Life Insurers Reevaluate Amid Rising Mental Health Claims 16 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori In a growing industry concern, the Council of Australian Life Insurers has highlighted an alarming increase in mental health-related claims, which are now the leading cause of total and permanent disability (TPD) claims. The rise has driven insurers to reconsider their current practices and strategies to address this trend. - read more

QBE Highlights the Importance of Adequate Landlord Insurance 15 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori Landlords in Australia have been advised by QBE Insurance Group to reassess their insurance coverage, following survey findings that indicate many could encounter financial hardships if their rental operations are interrupted. According to QBE's data, 38% of landlords might face financial challenges should their properties become uninhabitable or rental payments cease for a duration of two to six weeks. - read more

Court Denies E-Scooter Negligence Allegation Against City Council 14 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori An Australian court recently ruled in favour of the City of Joondalup, rejecting a negligence claim lodged by an injured e-scooter rider. The Western Australia District Court found the city not liable for an accident involving insurance broker Kirstin Leibbrandt, who collided with a fence post while riding an e-scooter in the Perth suburb of Hillarys. - read more