Customer Wins in Insurance Dispute Over Laser Equipment
Customer Wins in Insurance Dispute Over Laser Equipment
2
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
In a recent ruling, a salon owner successfully contested a claim with her insurance provider concerning a dispute over a laser machine.
This case highlights significant issues around insurance policy interpretation and customer rights.
The crux of the dispute arose when the salon's laser machine broke down in February, and repair costs were estimated at $18,069. The salon owner had insured the machine for $50,000 in December of the previous year, following its second-hand purchase and refurbishment in 2012 for $66,000.
Despite acknowledging the damage, QBE Insurance reduced its compensation to $7,286, citing an underinsurance clause. QBE claimed that due to the model being discontinued, a replacement would necessitate insuring at $155,000.
The insurer's clause stipulated that if the sum insured was less than 80% of the "total new replacement value," the liability could be adjusted accordingly. However, the salon owner challenged this assessment, arguing that a comparable refurbished machine was valued between $30,000 and $45,000.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) intervened, siding with the salon owner. AFCA declared that policy wording began ambiguous, noting discrepancies in terms such as "full value" and "total new replacement value", creating confusion about the clause's intent.
AFCA clarified: "When the policy is read as a whole, it indicates the laser should be insured for its full value, or what it would cost to replace with a similar laser in a similar condition." They refuted QBE's expectation that the salon owner should have insured the laser for $155,000, indicating she would never recoup more than $50,000 under policy terms.
This ruling mandates QBE to cover the repair costs, less the policy’s deductible. The case emphasizes the importance of clarity in insurance contracts and equitable treatment of claims.
Published:Wednesday, 27th Nov 2024 Source: Paige Estritori
Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.
In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of New South Wales has imposed fines totaling $16.8 million on Allianz Australia Insurance and its subsidiary, AWP Australia, for disseminating misleading information about their travel insurance products between 2016 and 2018. This decision underscores the critical importance of transparency and accuracy in the insurance sector. - read more
Recent research conducted by the Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) has unveiled a concerning trend: approximately 14% of Australian travellers embark on international journeys without any form of travel insurance. This statistic has prompted Allianz Partners to urge Australians to reconsider the importance of securing adequate coverage before travelling abroad. - read more
In 2024, medical incidents emerged as the leading cause of travel insurance claims among Australian travellers, accounting for more than 40% of all claims handled by nib Travel. This trend underscores the critical importance of securing comprehensive travel insurance to mitigate the financial risks associated with medical emergencies abroad. - read more
In a significant ruling, Allianz Australia Insurance and its subsidiary, AWP Australia, have been fined a total of $16.8 million for providing misleading information about their travel insurance products. The Supreme Court of New South Wales found that between 2016 and 2018, the companies misrepresented the extent of coverage available to consumers, leading to potential misunderstandings about policy benefits. - read more
Recent research conducted by the Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) has unveiled a concerning trend: approximately 14% of Australian travellers embark on international journeys without any form of travel insurance. This statistic has prompted Allianz Partners to urge Australians to reconsider the importance of securing adequate coverage before travelling abroad. - read more
Welcome to your guide to embark on an amazing journey from Australia to the breathtaking landscapes of Canada on a working holiday. This adventure presents an inviting blend of work and travel, allowing you to immerse yourself fully in Canadian culture while supporting your explorations financially. - read more
Travelling is one of life's greatest joys, but it's not without its risks. This is where travel insurance comes into play for Australians. It ensures peace of mind, knowing that you're covered for unforeseen events such as medical emergencies, trip cancellations, or lost luggage. - read more
Travel insurance is an essential component of any trip, providing protection and peace of mind for Australian travelers. Whether you are planning a short weekend getaway or an extended overseas adventure, unforeseen circumstances such as medical emergencies, trip cancellations, or lost luggage can quickly derail your plans and drain your finances. - read more
When it comes to travelling abroad, there's more to preparation than just packing the right clothes and booking your flights. For Australian travellers venturing overseas, assembling a financial travel kit is just as vital as a passport. This kit serves as your safeguard, ensuring that even when faced with the unpredictable, your journey remains as smooth as possible. - read more
For many Australian travellers, setting off on a global adventure is an exciting prospect. Yet, amidst this excitement, it's crucial to acknowledge the unexpected twists and turns that could arise. That's where travel insurance steps in. Not just a safety net, it serves as a vital component of travel planning, providing peace of mind as you explore the world. - read more
Knowledgebase
Moral Hazard: The concept that individuals may take on more risk when they do not bear the full consequences of that risk, often relevant in insurance scenarios.